
% Table created by stargazer v.5.2.2 by Marek Hlavac, Harvard University. E-mail: hlavac at fas.harvard.edu
% Date and time: Sun, Jan 30, 2022 - 5:16:22 PM
\begin{table}[!htbp] \centering 
  \caption{Representativeness and innumeracy cause people to over-apply party stereotypes} 
  \label{tab:representativeness} 
\begin{tabular}{@{\extracolsep{5pt}}lcc} 
\\[-1.8ex]\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\\[-1.8ex] & \multicolumn{2}{c}{\textbf{DV: Reported Perception of p(group | party)}} \\ 
\\[-1.8ex] & \textbf{Model 1} & \textbf{Model 2}\\ 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
 Numeracy &  & $-$0.10$^{**}$ \\ 
  &  & (0.04) \\ 
  Base rate treatment & $-$0.05$^{***}$ & $-$0.07 \\ 
  & (0.01) & (0.04) \\ 
  BR * numeracy &  & 0.03 \\ 
  &  & (0.06) \\ 
  Group composition treatment & 0.07$^{***}$ & 0.25$^{***}$ \\ 
  & (0.02) & (0.05) \\ 
  GC * numeracy &  & $-$0.23$^{***}$ \\ 
  &  & (0.06) \\ 
  Constant & 0.29$^{***}$ & 0.37$^{***}$ \\ 
  & (0.04) & (0.05) \\ 
 N & 1822 & 1822 \\ 
Log Likelihood & 249.43 & 271.20 \\ 
AIC & $-$486.87 & $-$524.41 \\ 
BIC & $-$453.82 & $-$474.84 \\ 
\hline \\[-1.8ex] 
\multicolumn{3}{l}{$^{***}$p $<$ .01; $^{**}$p $<$ .05; $^{*}$p $<$ .1} \\ 
\end{tabular} 
\end{table} 
